From simply the second ball of the match, Marizanne Kapp and South Africa have been satisfied they’d opener Tammy Beaumont lbw with a really convincing attraction, nevertheless it was given not out and England’s opening pair proceeded so as to add 53 for the primary wicket.
Proteas captain Laura Wolvaardt was batting fluently and regarded set on steering her aspect to first-innings parity earlier than she was given out lbw to Sophie Ecclestone on 65.
Wolvaardt was livid whereas marching off the pitch, knocking her bat to her helmet and muttering that she had hit it – a response for which she was finally fined by the Worldwide Cricket Council (ICC).
However essentially the most contentious of the choices – regardless of having much less of an affect on the eventual results of the match – got here in South Africa’s second innings when England appealed for a catch at quick leg off Dercksen, and the on-field umpires proceeded to have it checked by the third umpire, very like a evaluation.
Even with no DRS in play, umpires are usually allowed to examine with the third umpire for clear catches and bump balls, situations that they may not be capable of see cleanly in actual time – but on this case, the catch was taken at chest top.
“The appropriate determination was made ultimately, as a result of it did seem like there was an edge, however I simply suppose it was the fallacious course of,” Hartley advised BBC Check Match Particular.
“There was by no means any doubt round whether or not it was a clear catch or not. It is the truth that no person is aware of what the decision-making was.
“What it has proven is that DRS must be in place for each worldwide match after which we would not be speaking about it. It must be a wake-up name for Cricket South Africa.”